Toni’s Blog #5 (Freud)

From Freud:

“Dreams are brief, meager and laconic in comparison with the range and wealth of the dream-thoughts.  If a dream is written out it may perhaps fill half a page.  The analysis setting out the dream-thoughts underlying it may occupy six, eight or a dozen times as much space” (819).

                While reading this particular passage from Freud, I was struck by all of our recent readings about the instability of a text, or a text as a living thing.  The recording of the dream-thoughts, though a stable text, is open to myriad interpretations, in fact, Freud says that it is not possible “to be sure that a dream has been completely interpreted” (819).  He considers (like literary critics) that a dream may have many interpretations.  Where Freud seems to part with the deconstructionists is his consideration of the author.  In order for Freud’s dream-work to be successful, he must examine the author.  Freud’s author (the dreamer) is crucial to analysis, and to eliminate him/her is to limit the text, or dream-thoughts.  Without an investigation of the author of the dream-thoughts, an analysis cannot be done.  This appears to be in direct contrast with Barthes who claims that to consider the author is to apply limitations to the text.  What to do???

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s